Tag: Biologics


Christine Norris

The Federal Circuit’s Recent “Safe Harbor” Ruling Could Impact Biosimilars Drug Development

Posted on September 21st, by Christine Norris in IP. No Comments

A recent Federal Circuit case, Momenta v. Amphastar, involves the Hatch-Waxman 271(e)(1) safe harbor, and is rousing the biologics and biosimilars industry.  In particular, the court held in Momenta, that section 271(e)(1) does apply to certain post-approval activities.

As background, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. filed for a preliminary injunction against Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., International Medication Systems, Ltd., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Watson Pharma, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,575,886.  The ‘886 patent generally claims processes for analyzing heterogeneous populations of sulfated polysaccharides.  Momenta alleged that Amphastar infringed the claimed processes when developing and manufacturing of batches of generic Lovenox (enoxaparin), a low-molecular-weight complex polysaccharide, for commercial sale.  (Momenta used the claimed processes to gain approval of its own generic enoxaparin one year earlier.)  The district court granted Momenta a preliminary injunction, concluding that Amphastar’s testing … Read More »


Leslie Tector

Are Biosimilars the Next Generation of Small Drug Manufacturers?

New reports suggest that while generic drug makers are aggressively consolidating in the United States and United Kingdom, smaller generic drug manufacturers’ viability is threatened, forcing them to seek niche therapeutic areas.  Manufacturing biosimilar biologicals may be an answer for the smaller generic drug companies, due to several factors.  First, while manufacturing complexities create market entry barriers, recent shortages of the biologics supply in the U.S. have increased the market demand.  Also, low margins are causing large manufacturing companies to exit the biologics market.  Furthermore, the patents for many top selling biologics will expire in the next 3 to 5 years, creating an opportunity for new market entrants.  Finally, the new abbreviated approval pathway for biosimilars in the U.S. may be more conducive to the needs of smaller firms: efficient approval process, lower development costs, and protection for first generation biologics.

Background

In … Read More »




From the Blog

The Debate Over Mobile Health Software Regulation

On November 19th, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health held a hearing to examine the federal regulation of mobile medical applications (mobile...

23 Skidoo – Genomes, Gamesmanship and the First Amendment

On November 22, 2013, the Inquisition collided with the Internet.  On that date, the Food and Drug Administration issued a Warning Letter threatening 23andMe,...

FDA’s Warning Letter to 23andMe: Ethical and Legal Issues

The FDA’s warning letter to 23andMe, the maker of mail-order genetic tests, highlights the challenging legal and ethical issues posed by such products.  While...