Q&A With Drinker Biddle’s Robyn Shapiro
Posted on July 5th, by Michael Shapiro-Barr
Robyn Shapiro was recently interviewed by Law360 Life Sciences:

Michael Shapiro-Barr
Health Group Analyst at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Michael Shapiro-Barr is an Analyst in our Health Care Practice Group. His authored contributions to the blog are derived from his own experiences and perspectives on the life sciences industry. He is not a licensed attorney and his writings should not be viewed as legal advice.

@lifesciencesnow
Follow @lifesciencesnow

Latest posts by Michael Shapiro-Barr (see all)
- Ethical Issues Surrounding Noncompliance in Organ Donation - August 23, 2013
- Organ Transplantation in Children: What is Ethical? - June 14, 2013
- Robyn Shapiro talks about conflicts of interest at MAGI East 2013 - May 8, 2013
Leave a Reply
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Categories
Bioethics & Clinical Research (15)Compliance (16)
Corporate (2)
Customs & Trade (5)
Genetics (2)
IP (10)
Labor & Employment (6)
Life Sciences (9)
Litigation (12)
Privacy & Data Security (2)
Products Liability (3)
Sunshine Act (6)
Media Quotes
- Mercedes Meyer, a patent lawyer with the firm Drinker Biddle in Washington, D.C., said the Supreme Court’s failure to provide “bright-line guidance”—a ruling that would settle once-and-for all whether patent settlements are legal or not—means there’s “really no difference now than what was going on.” Mercedes Meyer
CNBC: High Court Allows FTC to Challenge 'Pay-to-Delay' Generics
Article Tags
about applicable approval Biosimilars business circuit clinical companies court covered device DNA FDA final first government Health healthcare hipaa industry information innovation label Life Sciences manufacturers medical Medical Device other patent payment pharma Pharmaceutical privacy required research should styletext supreme technology their trial trials under which would
Blogroll
- Capitol Health Record
- Labor Sphere
- Legally Social: A Blog on Social Media Law